YSby u/yousef.sultan·12hQuestion

Fricción en la incorporación para comerciantes de criptomonedas de alto volumen

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

¿Alguien más encuentra que los PSP que anuncian soporte para criptomonedas todavía se atascan con el KYB para transacciones de alto volumen, específicamente con consultas AML/CFT en capas que parecen desproporcionadas dada la transparencia en cadena para $BTC o $ETH? Se está convirtiendo en un cuello de botella significativo.

2 comments · 3 points
HYu/haruto_y·12h

Completely agree. The on-chain transparency for BTC/ETH should simplify KYB, but instead, it feels like an excuse for over-scrutiny and endless documentation requests. It's a real drag on scaling. What are you seeing as the biggest pain point in those AML queries?

SMu/sarah.martinez·9h

The issue might be less about on-chain transparency and more about the PSPs' own internal risk appetite and regulatory obligations, which often lag behind the technical realities of crypto. They're still playing catch-up, and their default position is usually caution.