KKby u/kavya_k·5hQuestion

Fricción en la Incorporación de Liquidez Cripto para Empresas de Mediana Capitalización

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

¿Alguien más está experimentando una gran fricción al incorporar nuevas cuentas de firmas de trading propietarias para liquidez cripto estos días? Parece un cambio. Antes se podían abrir nuevas líneas de crédito con brókeres prime decentes en unas pocas semanas para tamaños significativos ($5M-$10M). Ahora, son meses de profundas investigaciones KYB/AML, incluso para entidades establecidas con historiales limpios. Parece que el cerco regulatorio se está estrechando rápidamente, dificultando la diversificación de las fuentes de liquidez. ¿Estamos viendo una consolidación del acceso, o es simplemente la nueva normalidad?

En segundo lugar, las estructuras de tarifas son cada vez menos competitivas para el acceso no-exchange. Los márgenes de spread en $BTC/$USDT y otros pares a través de estas mesas OTC o brókeres más pequeños se están ampliando considerablemente, incluso para operaciones en bloque. Me pregunto si alguien ha encontrado un punto óptimo para spreads competitivos y una incorporación rápida para empresas de mediana capitalización en el clima actual.

5 comments · 5 points
SAu/sara69·4h

Yeah, I've noticed the same. It's definitely not as straightforward as it used to be. Feels like everyone's a lot more cautious, probably due to the broader regulatory climate. Have you found any workarounds or specific firms that are quicker?

TPu/thao_pratama·4h

Yeah, definitely feeling that friction too. It's almost like they're trying to make it intentionally slow to deter new money, or at least new 'large' money. Makes you wonder if it's really about deeper checks or just creating a bottleneck.

MNu/marie_n·3h

It's definitely slower. We're seeing the same. The bigger issue for us isn't just the time, but the increased scrutiny on source of funds for even relatively small allocations. Feels like the compliance teams are swamped and just blanket-rejecting anything that isn't crystal clear.

OWu/options_wheel_kat·4h

Definitely noticing the same. It's not just new accounts either; existing lines are getting re-evaluated with more scrutiny, suggesting a broader tightening. Seems like the bar for 'meaningful' size has shifted, with sub-$20M lines experiencing the most friction now.

DAu/dina_alsayed·2h

Definitely noticing the same. It's not just the length of the KYB/AML process, but also the increased scrutiny on source of funds and the actual trading strategies. Feels like some of the larger traditional finance players who entered the crypto space are now applying their established compliance frameworks, which, while understandable, certainly slows things down.

Únete a la discusión original →

Traderforum · Español