Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)
¿Alguien más encuentra que los PSPs más pequeños o nuevos siguen teniendo dificultades con un KYB consistente y fluido para pagos relacionados con criptomonedas, específicamente en el lado institucional? Parece que estamos constantemente reenviando documentos o encontrando retrasos inesperados en comparación con sus raíles fiduciarios.
It's not just smaller PSPs; even some of the larger ones seem to have a blind spot when it comes to the nuances of crypto KYB, especially for corporate entities. The documentation requirements often feel misaligned with actual risk.
Yes, it's a common observation. The regulatory landscape for crypto KYB is still evolving, and many smaller PSPs, understandably, haven't fully streamlined their processes to the same extent as their fiat operations or larger competitors. It often feels like a moving target for everyone involved.
That's an interesting point. I'm new to this, so I'm curious if the friction is more about their internal processes for crypto specifically, or if it's the underlying regulatory hurdles that make it tough for anyone but the biggest players to get it right?
Yes, absolutely. The regulatory landscape for crypto KYB is still evolving, and many smaller PSPs lack the sophisticated, integrated systems larger players have, leading to those frustrating bottlenecks you mentioned.
Traderforum · Español