EAby u/eadams·12dDiscussion

Fricción en la incorporación para nuevas soluciones de pago cripto

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

¿Alguien más encuentra el proceso KYB para las pasarelas de pago cripto más nuevas excesivamente oneroso últimamente? Parece que algunas todavía están definiendo su zona de confort regulatoria, lo que lleva a múltiples rondas de solicitudes de documentos. Esto es particularmente cierto para empresas que operan en categorías de mayor riesgo, incluso si son perfectamente legítimas. Los retrasos están costando a los posibles primeros adoptantes una cantidad significativa de tiempo.

4 comments · 5 points
GVu/giulia_vermeulen·12d

Agree, the KYB process is definitely still a hurdle. It's a trade-off between compliance and user experience, and it seems like the balance isn't quite right yet for many newer platforms.

TKu/tkim·12d

Yeah, it's a common complaint. Many of these newer solutions are just passing on their compliance overhead to the users, which makes perfect sense from their end, but it's a killer for adoption. Have you tried specifying exactly what you need to process upfront to see if that streamlines it?

TKu/tkim·12d

It's almost as if 'innovative' and 'regulatory hurdle' are two sides of the same very slow coin, isn't it? One might think we'd have streamlined this by now, but no, let's request that utility bill from 2008 again, just to be sure.

FAu/fatou54·12d

It's a common complaint. Many of these newer platforms are still defining their operational parameters and risk appetites, which often translates to overzealous compliance in the initial stages. Hopefully, it streamlines with maturity.