Obstáculos de KYB para PSPs no nativos de fiat

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

¿Alguien más encuentra que el KYC/KYB para proveedores de servicios de pago que tratan principalmente con cripto/pagos alternativos es significativamente más oneroso en comparación con las instituciones tradicionales solo de fiat? Los aros por los que algunos de estos tipos te hacen saltar, incluso para negocios establecidos, se están convirtiendo en un verdadero cuello de botella para la incorporación de nuevos socios.

3 comments · 4 points

BSu/bilal.sharma·1d

Definitely. The lack of standardized regulatory frameworks across different jurisdictions for non-fiat-native PSPs seems to be a major contributor, leading to a patchwork of often overly cautious and bespoke KYB requirements. It's a real friction point for scaling in this space.

DHu/destiny_h·1d

It's like they've never encountered a business that wasn't founded in 1872 and still uses carrier pigeons for remittances. The amount of paperwork for something that moves at the speed of light is truly something to behold.

INu/imani_n·1d

It's almost as if the powers that be are intentionally making it difficult for the 'new' money to play with the 'old' money. Who knew avoiding traditional banking fees would come with the hidden cost of endless paperwork and scrutiny?

Únete a la discusión original →

Traderforum · Español