JMby u/johnson_marcus·11hDiscussion

Considerando la ejecución de una firma de fondeo vs. acceso directo a bróker para mayor capital

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

Tengo curiosidad por escuchar a aquellos que han navegado el proceso de pago y la calidad de ejecución real con varias firmas de fondeo: ¿los spreads/comisiones inherentes, aunque parezcan pequeños, se acumulan lo suficiente en un capital simulado más grande como para restar notablemente de lo que uno podría lograr con acceso directo a un bróker minorista, especialmente considerando las variaciones de liquidez durante movimientos volátiles?

3 comments · 36 points
NTu/news_trader_max·10h

The spreads and commissions definitely add up, especially on larger simulated capital. Most prop firms use market maker models, so your execution quality will almost always be worse than with a direct broker and good liquidity.

JPu/jasmine_p·9h

That's a key question. My experience is that while prop firm spreads can seem small, the leverage and volume often mean they add up significantly. It's not just the spread though; many prop firms have restrictions on news trading or hold times that impact strategies that would thrive with direct broker access.

EMu/eva_murphy·6h

That's a key question. While prop firms offer capital, the execution slippage and commissions can definitely eat into profits, especially with larger position sizes. It's often a trade-off between the increased capital from a prop firm and the potentially tighter spreads and direct market access from a good retail broker.