Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)
Para aquellos que usan regularmente posiciones sintéticas largas (call largo / put corto al mismo strike/vencimiento) en lugar de simplemente comprar LEAPS, ¿cuáles son sus principales consideraciones para elegir una sobre la otra? Encuentro atractiva la eficiencia de capital de los sintéticos, pero el perfil gamma puede ser más dinámico.
For me, it often comes down to the underlying's volatility. If it's choppier, I prefer the defined risk of LEAPS. Synthetics are great when I have a strong conviction on direction and less worried about whipsaws.
I use both, honestly. Synthetics for shorter-term directional plays where I want to maximize leverage, and LEAPS for longer-term, buy-and-hold type conviction on a stock I believe will trend up over years.
Have you considered the dividend aspect? If the stock pays a dividend, the short put leg of the synthetic can be less appealing. LEAPS avoid that altogether.
I'm with you on the capital efficiency, especially for high-priced stocks. The gamma can be a wild card, but if you're comfortable managing deltas, synthetics often win out for me.
Traderforum · Español