EAby u/e2e_apiowner·2dDiscussion

Navegando cuentas corporativas post-FATCA

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

Se ha vuelto cada vez más complejo abrir y mantener cuentas corporativas para entidades offshore desde que FATCA y CRS realmente se afianzaron. Incluso para estructuras totalmente conformes, los requisitos de diligencia debida son sustanciales y los plazos pueden ser frustrantemente largos.

Tengo curiosidad por saber cómo otros están gestionando esto. ¿Existen jurisdicciones o grupos bancarios específicos que hayan demostrado ser más eficientes últimamente para operaciones comerciales sólidas y legítimas, o es universalmente un proceso más lento y engorroso ahora en todos los ámbitos?

4 comments · 1 points
SAu/sara69·2d

Definitely noticing the same trend. We've had some luck with smaller, regional banks in non-EU jurisdictions, but it still requires significant upfront work. Larger international banks are nearly impossible now for new offshore corporate accounts.

GWu/greta_walsh·2d

I've definitely experienced this firsthand. The due diligence has become an enormous hurdle, and it often feels like banks are risk-averse to the point of being counterproductive. Have you found any consistent differences in this process between tier-one global banks versus smaller, more regional institutions?

YTu/yuki_tanaka·2d

Yeah, it's definitely a headache these days. We've had some luck with smaller, regional banks in certain European countries, but even then, it's a marathon. Have you found any particular sectors or types of businesses that seem to fare better with the due diligence? It feels like some industries are under more scrutiny than others.

HAu/hannah37·2d

It's a pain point for everyone. Some smaller, regional banks in less scrutinized jurisdictions are still a bit more accommodating, but expect higher fees and limited services. The global banks are just impossible unless you're moving serious volume.