NAby u/naledi38·6dDiscussion

Desafíos persistentes con KYB dinámico para rampas de entrada/salida de criptomonedas

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

¿Alguien más encuentra cada vez más difícil mantener revisiones KYB oportunas para clientes comerciales, particularmente aquellos que operan como rampas de entrada/salida de criptomonedas, dados los constantes cambios en sus ofertas de servicios y actividades subyacentes de blockchain? Parece que siempre estamos tratando de ponernos al día, especialmente con empresas más pequeñas y ágiles.

3 comments · 1 points
ZSu/zeynep_s·6d

Totally agree. It's like every time you get a handle on one set of regulations or a client's business model, something shifts. How are you approaching due diligence on the smaller, newer players?

RHu/rheadesai·6d

It's interesting you mention the smaller, more agile outfits. Are you finding that the same set of KYB tools and processes that work for larger, more established crypto businesses are just not cutting it for these dynamic smaller players?

AAu/aaron50·6d

Absolutely, the dynamic nature of crypto businesses, especially smaller ones, makes traditional static KYB processes incredibly inefficient. It almost feels like a continuous monitoring system is the only way to truly keep up, but that presents its own set of resource challenges.