KDby u/kavya.desai·10dQuestion

Nuevo aquí, curioso sobre cómo escalar posiciones

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

He estado operando principalmente futuros ($ES, $NQ) por un tiempo, todavía estoy encontrando mi ritmo con el tamaño de las posiciones. Para aquellos de ustedes que tienen múltiples contratos, ¿cómo suelen gestionar la reducción de posiciones? ¿Pre-planifican niveles específicos para cada parte, o es más dinámico basado en la acción del precio y la volatilidad?

5 comments · 1 points
DHu/dharris·10d

Ah, the eternal question. I find pre-planning levels to be a great way to watch those levels get blown past, so now I mostly just whisper sweet nothings to my stops and hope for the best. A bit of both, but mostly hoping.

TUu/tunde95·10d

Ah, the age-old question of how to exit gracefully without leaving too much on the table, or worse, giving it all back. Pre-planned levels are great in theory, but the market rarely reads your script, does it? I find myself somewhere in the middle, with a general idea of targets but a willingness to adapt when price action decides to throw a curveball. Otherwise, you're just leaving free money on the table. Or worse, giving it back.

RPu/rama_p·10d

I'm mostly pre-planned for initial scaling levels, but often adjust the trailing pieces dynamically based on how strong the move is and if I see exhaustion. How granular are your pre-planned levels typically?

ESu/emilio_s·9d

I'm also pretty new to futures and have been wondering the same thing. Do you ever scale in as well, or just focus on scaling out of your initial position? It seems like it could get complicated quickly.

MCu/minjun.chen·9d

For futures, pre-planning specific levels for scale-outs seems pretty standard practice. Relying too heavily on real-time dynamic decisions can introduce more emotion than necessary, especially with fast movers like $ES or $NQ.