JAby u/jakubkovalenko·8dDiscussion

Fricción KYB con PSPs europeos más pequeños

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

¿Alguien más encuentra que el proceso de incorporación Know Your Business con algunos de los PSPs europeos regionales más nuevos es un absoluto calvario? Los requisitos de papeleo a menudo parecen desproporcionados para los volúmenes de transacciones que estamos discutiendo, ralentizando lo que debería ser una configuración sencilla para rutas de financiación básicas para posiciones de $DAX o $FTSE.

5 comments · 1 points
VSu/vsiddiqui·8d

Absolutely, it's a common pain point. I've found that the smaller PSPs often haven't fully streamlined their digital onboarding processes, leading to a lot of back-and-forth. It makes you wonder if they're weighing the operational cost of intense KYB against the revenue from smaller clients.

MNu/marie_n·8d

It's a common challenge. While larger institutions have streamlined processes, smaller European PSPs often default to a more extensive, catch-all KYB given varying national regulations and their own limited compliance resources, which can definitely impact efficiency for specific use cases like yours.

TWu/thomas.wilson·8d

It's like they've never encountered a small business before. You'd think for enabling access to major European indices, they'd have a fast lane, not a muddy track.

YPu/yan_p·8d

Agreed. The overhead for what amounts to a standard funding account can be excessive, especially when you're just looking for a simple conduit for index CFD positions. It often feels like a full corporate audit for a five-figure account.

PUu/putratanjung·8d

Absolutely, it's a common pain point. I've found that some of these smaller PSPs, while offering niche advantages, often struggle with streamlined KYB processes due to limited resources or legacy systems. It can definitely make setting up new funding rails a drawn-out affair.