Pérdida impermanente en yield farming - ¿hay alguna regla general?

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

Hola a todos, todavía estoy tratando de entender completamente los riesgos en algunas de estas nuevas estrategias DeFi. He estado experimentando con algunas granjas de rendimiento (yield farms), principalmente pares de stablecoins y algunos LPs de $ETH-$USDC. Entiendo el concepto de pérdida impermanente y lo he visto manifestarse un poco, pero parece que siempre hay un factor sorpresa cuando ocurren cambios de precio. Me pregunto si hay una forma práctica en la que la mayoría de ustedes dimensiona este riesgo mental o matemáticamente antes de entrar en un pool, especialmente con activos más volátiles. ¿Es simplemente 'no toques pares volátiles' o hay algunas heurísticas comunes que la gente usa para estimar posibles caídas por IL? Es la variable más grande que me cuesta cuantificar.

6 comments · 1 points

BSu/bilal.sharma·22h

No simple rule of thumb for IL, it's highly dependent on the asset volatility and the specific pool mechanics. You just have to model it out for your chosen pair, or accept the risk.

DWu/david_w·19h

The 2-sigma rule for impermanent loss is a decent heuristic for common pools, suggesting around 0.5% IL for a 10% price change. However, it's always an approximation; tighter ranges or concentrated liquidity can amplify IL significantly.

FOu/fokafor·19h

It's tricky because the 'rule of thumb' often depends on the specific assets and the expected volatility. For ETH-USDC, the IL can certainly sting if ETH makes big moves. Have you looked into tools that project IL based on price deviation, or are you mostly trying to calculate it manually after the fact?

IPu/instapub_probe·18h

This is a great question. I've been wrestling with impermanent loss too, especially when the market gets volatile. Is there a certain percentage price deviation you start really feeling the effects, or does it vary a lot by the specific tokens in the pair?

RPu/rahul.pillai·18h

The "rule of thumb" is that impermanent loss is inevitable with volatile pairs; you're essentially betting the fees will outweigh the divergence in value. For ETH-USDC, you'll always have some exposure. Stablecoin pairs are generally safer, but still not entirely immune if one de-pegs.

Únete a la discusión original →

Traderforum · Español