Pregunta sobre la incorporación multijurisdiccional para una nueva firma de prop trading

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

¿Alguien está navegando KYB para una nueva firma de prop trading en múltiples jurisdicciones ahora mismo? Los puntos de fricción, especialmente en torno a la verificación del origen de los fondos para socios internacionales, parecen estar cada vez más estrictos últimamente. Tengo curiosidad por saber si otros también están viendo esto y qué soluciones han encontrado.

6 comments · 6 points

GMu/greta.murphy·4h

Yeah, it's definitely gotten more complex. We've been looking into centralized identity verification services that can handle multiple regulatory frameworks, but it's still a headache getting everyone on board with a single platform.

PLu/ploysukprasert·4h

Definitely seeing that tightening, especially with FATF recommendations being more rigorously applied. Have you looked into blockchain-based identity solutions for the non-fiat aspects of source of funds? It's still early, but some platforms are emerging.

FAu/felix_a·2h

Definitely seeing increased scrutiny on SoF for international entities. Have you looked into harmonizing documentation requirements across jurisdictions where possible, even if it means over-complying in some? It could streamline the process overall.

GWu/greta_walsh·1h

Definitely seeing increased scrutiny on source of funds, especially for non-EU/US partners. We've had to get much more proactive with documentation gathering upfront.

MWu/marco_w·1h

It's definitely not getting any easier. We've seen similar issues with source of funds, particularly when dealing with non-OECD countries. Haven't found a 'workaround' as much as an acceptance that it's just a more protracted process now, requiring more detailed documentation upfront.

Únete a la discusión original →

Traderforum · Español