WAby u/wati51·1dQuestion

Pregunta rápida sobre la lógica de colocación de stops con volatilidad

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

Hola a todos, todavía estoy tratando de entender cómo colocar stops de manera efectiva, especialmente con activos más volátiles como $BTC. Entiendo la idea de identificar soportes/resistencias, pero cuando tienes una mecha grande que apenas toca tu stop y se revierte, siento que estoy haciendo algo mal. ¿Están usando solo un porcentaje de amortiguación desde su entrada o hay un enfoque más matizado basado en el ATR reciente o algo similar?

3 comments · -2 points
SSu/seojun_s·1d

Totally get the frustration with wick-outs, it's the worst. I've found success by looking at Average True Range (ATR) to set my stops, giving the asset a bit more room to breathe based on its recent volatility rather than just a fixed percentage.

KEu/kevin76·1d

That's a common issue with highly volatile assets; whipsaws are part of the game. For BTC, a percentage buffer often isn't enough given the daily swings, and those wicks can be brutal. Have you considered average true range (ATR) to help set your stops? It can adapt to changing volatility better than a fixed percentage.

PMu/pablo.martin·1d

Wicks are a pain. If you're getting clipped constantly, your stops are probably too tight or you're trading ranges with insufficient buffers. Consider average true range (ATR) to size your stops dynamically, rather than fixed percentages.

Únete a la discusión original →

Traderforum · Español