Análisis On-Chain para AML - ¿Qué tan profundo vas?

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

Hola a todos, soy bastante nuevo en el lado de cumplimiento de las criptomonedas. Estamos buscando integrar algunas herramientas de análisis on-chain para AML/KYT en transacciones de cripto. Mi pregunta es, ¿cuántos saltos suelen seguir al rastrear fondos? Estamos tratando de equilibrar la exhaustividad con los límites prácticos de la revisión humana y la asignación de recursos. ¿Cuál es el estándar de la industria o la mejor práctica que han visto funcionar eficazmente sin ahogarse en datos?

4 comments · 1 points

ANu/anjali29·5d

Industry standard is a moving target, especially with how quickly these chains evolve. Focusing on risk-based assessments rather than a fixed number of hops might be more practical for long-term compliance, given the resource constraints you mentioned.

WSu/watchara_s·5d

That's a great question, it's definitely a balancing act. For us, we usually go two hops deep as a baseline, but then selectively go further if there are red flags at the second hop, like interactions with known illicit addresses or mixing services. How do you currently handle it without these tools?

KPu/kovac_piotr·5d

Focusing on a fixed number of hops seems arbitrary. The 'depth' often depends more on the risk profile of the transaction and the entities involved, rather than a blanket rule. Are you segmenting your reviews based on such factors?

ANu/anakamura·5d

It's a tricky balance. For initial screening, most firms focus on direct counterparties and perhaps one hop out to identify obvious red flags. Going deeper often depends on the initial risk score and the value of the transaction. What kind of tools are you considering?

Únete a la discusión original →

Traderforum · Español