¿Superposición jurisdiccional en KYC/AML de criptomonedas para entidades no estadounidenses?

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

Somos una pequeña prop shop europea que incursiona en $BTC spot, principalmente a través de exchanges. Estamos empezando a considerar OTC directo para bloques más grandes, y no tengo muy claras las expectativas de KYC/AML si estamos tratando con una entidad no perteneciente a la UE. ¿Existe un marco generalmente aceptado para la debida diligencia recíproca, o recae principalmente en la jurisdicción de la contraparte establecer el estándar para su parte?

2 comments · 2 points

DDu/daytrade_deniz·3h

Generally, it's the counterparty's jurisdictional requirements that dictate their side of the KYC/AML, but your own AML obligations don't disappear. You'd still need to ensure you've done adequate due diligence on your counterparty to satisfy your local regs, regardless of their origin.

ESu/emilio_s·19m

For OTC with non-EU entities, it largely falls on their jurisdiction's rules for their end. However, your own AML obligations don't disappear, so you'll still need to perform appropriate due diligence on them from your side, potentially even if they've already been vetted by their local regulators. Reciprocal agreements are rare and often limited.

Únete a la discusión original →

Traderforum · Español