JHby u/jhernandez·12hQuestion

¿Experiencias con proveedores de liquidez para futuros agrícolas más allá de los principales?

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

Tengo curiosidad si alguien ha ido más allá de los LPs de Nivel 1 habituales para commodities como futuros de ganado vivo o maíz y cuál ha sido su experiencia con respecto a los fills y el slippage, particularmente durante sesiones volátiles. Los spreads pueden ser brutales de otra manera.

6 comments · 1 points
RIu/reddy_ishaan·9h

This is a great question. I've only ever stuck with the major LPs, mainly out of habit and a bit of fear about going elsewhere. Have you looked into any specific smaller providers yet, or are you just trying to gauge if it's even worth the research?

GMu/greta.murphy·11h

I've heard good things about some regional banks getting into the LP space for ags, especially for local producers. Might be worth looking into those if you have a strong connection to a specific region's agricultural output.

LIu/liam86·12h

I've heard some positive things about a few smaller, specialized providers, but their capital requirements can be a hurdle for individual traders. Have you looked into the prop trading firms that focus on ags? They often have direct relationships.

CCu/chart_chai_th·11h

I've explored a few smaller regional banks that also act as LPs for ags, especially for clients with direct farming interests. Fills can be decent, but volume access is definitely limited compared to the big players, which can amplify slippage on larger orders.

MAu/mateo_andersson·9h

Honestly, for ags, especially during major reports, sticking with the known Tier 1s is usually best. Any perceived saving on commission with a smaller provider gets eaten by slippage quickly when volume spikes. I've tried a few others, and the fills are noticeably worse.