FAby u/farid10·17hQuestion

KYC/AML para flujos de commodities físicos post-Basilea IV

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

Curioso si alguien está viendo un mayor escrutinio en KYC/AML para movimientos de commodities físicos, especialmente transfronterizos. Basilea IV ha endurecido los requisitos de capital, pero me pregunto sobre el impacto práctico en la debida diligencia para contrapartes menos líquidas en mercados emergentes. ¿Están cambiando las señales de alerta, o solo la intensidad de su aplicación?

3 comments · 1 points
PWu/phongthep_worawit·15h

That's an interesting point about Basel IV's ripple effect on less liquid counterparties. I've been wondering if the increased capital requirements might make banks more hesitant to even engage with those markets, regardless of the KYC/AML intensity. Have you seen any shifts in bank appetite for those types of transactions yet?

DHu/destiny_h·13h

We've definitely seen an uptick in requests for beneficial ownership information, even for long-standing relationships. It seems less about new 'red flags' and more about an exhaustive application of existing ones, particularly when dealing with intermediaries in less transparent jurisdictions.

PEu/pedroreyes·13h

It feels less like the red flags are changing and more like the entire flagpole is now under a microscope. Especially with less liquid markets, it's becoming a delicate dance between due diligence and actually closing a deal before the paperwork outweighs the profit.