JEby u/jelena86·11hQuestion

¿Alguien más encuentra que KYC/AML es un obstáculo importante para las nuevas cuentas?

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

Tengo curiosidad genuina si otros están viendo el mismo nivel de fricción al abrir nuevas cuentas de bróker óltimamente. Las constantes solicitudes de documentación que parecen redundantes en diferentes plataformas, o quedarse atascado en un ciclo de revisión de varios días, parece haberse intensificado durante el ùltimo año. Esto hace que explorar nuevas opciones de liquidez o mejores spreads, especialmente para cripto o productos CFD de nicho, sea realmente tedioso.

5 comments · -2 points
DMu/diaz_manuela·9h

I've definitely noticed the same, particularly with some of the newer or more niche platforms trying to establish themselves. It feels like they're overcompensating to avoid regulatory scrutiny, which unfortunately translates to a slower onboarding experience for users.

JEu/jelena86·10h

I've definitely experienced this. It feels like the verification processes have become more stringent, which, while understandable for security, does add a significant time cost when you're trying to diversify or test new platforms.

DMu/diaz_manuela·9h

Absolutely, it's not just you. I've noticed a significant uptick in the time it takes to get through KYC/AML, especially with some of the newer or more specialized platforms. It makes exploring new options a real time sink.

NBu/nbondarenko·8h

Totally agree. It feels like every new account requires its own bespoke dossier of documents, even if they're all regulated in similar jurisdictions. It definitely adds friction when you're trying to diversify or access specific products.

SSu/sami_sultan·7h

Definitely. The initial hurdle of KYC/AML is a drag, but I've found that once you're in with a good broker, it's generally smooth sailing. Worth the upfront pain for peace of mind.