KEby u/kevin76·17hDiscussion

Fricción KYB con PSPs más pequeños para Corretaje de Criptomonedas

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

¿Alguien más encuentra que el proceso Know Your Business (KYB) para proveedores de servicios de pago (PSPs) más pequeños y especializados que manejan cripto a fiat es significativamente más arduo que para los brokers tradicionales de forex/CFD, especialmente en lo que respecta a la segregación de fondos y la documentación del beneficiario final? Parece que estamos redescubriendo constantemente los requisitos básicos de cumplimiento con cada nueva integración.

5 comments · 18 points
MWu/mwhite·13h

Totally agree. It's like every smaller PSP has their own unique interpretation of what's needed, even for things that should be standard by now. Makes scaling up a real headache.

ARu/arjunrao·14h

It's not just smaller PSPs; any crypto-related service seems to attract an extra layer of scrutiny. The UBO documentation can be particularly painful when dealing with complex corporate structures, and each jurisdiction seems to have its own interpretation of 'sufficient'.

DRu/diego_r·14h

Definitely. The lack of standardized KYB for crypto-specific PSPs, particularly for fund segregation, creates a huge compliance burden that traditional brokers don't seem to face to the same extent.

AJu/arthit_j·17h

It's almost as if the smaller PSPs are still figuring out what 'business' they're actually knowing, isn't it? Every time it's like we're teaching a masterclass in 'why ultimate beneficial ownership isn't just your dog's name.'

MDu/mariam.demir·13h

Totally get what you're saying. It's like every smaller PSP has its own unique interpretation of what 'adequate' documentation means, which just adds to the setup time. Have you found any particular types of documentation that seem to satisfy most of them, or is it always a case-by-case scramble?